Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Lyrics Lag ja gale, Woh kaun thi (1964)

Lyrics Lag ja gale, Woh kaun thi (1964)

Music By Madan Mohan
Lyrics By Raja Mehndi Ali Khan
Performed by Lata Mangeshkar


Lag Ja Gale Ki Phir
Ye Hasin Raat Ho Na Ho
Shayad Phir Is Janam Mein
Mulakat Ho Na Ho
Lag Jaa Gale Se ...

Hum Ko Mili Hai Aaj
Ye Ghadiya Naseeb Se
Je Bhar Ke Dekh Leejiye
Hamako Kareeb Se
Phir Apke Naseeb Mein
Ye Raat Ho Na Ho
Phir Is Janaam Mein
Mulakaat Ho Na Ho

Lag Ja Gale Ki Phir
Ye Hasin Raat Ho Na Ho……

Pas Aiye Ki Ham Nahin
Ayenge Baar Baar
Bahen Gale Mein Daal Ke
Ham Ro Le Zaar-zaar
Ankhoon Se Phir Ye
Pyaar Ki Barsaat Ho Na Ho
Shayad Phir Is Janam Mein
Mulakat Ho Na Ho


Lag Ja Gale Ki Phir
Ye Hasin Raat Ho Na Ho
Shayad Phir Is Janam Mein
Mulakat Ho Na Ho
Lag Jaa Gale Se

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Emperor, empowerer

The original article has been taken from here. It appeared at Cricinfo on 28th March 2008.

Reproduced here:

Viv Richards

Emperor, empowerer

The King had the extraordinary ability of lifting the teams he played for

Scyld Berry

March 28, 2008




No one has proclaimed such a message as Viv Richards did when he hit the ball © Getty Images

Before anyone thought of the phrase, Viv Richards walked the walk. After a suitable pause, following the applause for Gordon Greenidge or Desmond Haynes, Richards took the field like an emperor returning to his domains. Head held high, nose aquiline, jaw working his gum; the maroon cap - never, never, a helmet, for that would have been an admission of fear; and brandishing his choice of weapon, normally a Slazenger, in his right hand. Nobody has walked to the crease as Richards did. No choreographer, equipped with spotlights and sound effects, could have improved upon his natural entrance.

Nobody has batted like Viv Richards either. Sure, a few batsmen since his day have hit the ball as hard or harder, like Matthew Hayden or Adam Gilchrist. But nobody has proclaimed such a message as Richards did when he hit the ball. His batting was all power and dominance - his mental power, and the power of an awesomely muscular yet athletic 5' 10" body; and his dominance of the opposition, if not from the moment he made his grand entrance, then from the first ball, when he planted his front foot down the pitch and outside off stump and whipped it through midwicket for four. By the second ball of a Viv Richards innings, if not before, there were few teams who did not recognise that in their midst was a Master.

Richards has to rank among the half-dozen greatest cricketers of all time. It is not a matter of statistics, although his Test average of 50 was fine enough. It is a matter of what he did with his power and dominance. He not only led West Indies' domination of Test and one-day cricket in the eighties, as invincible captain in the second half of the decade or as the vice-captain, No. 3 batsman and figurehead of Clive Lloyd's side, he also empowered the teams he played for to an extent which has not been sufficiently appreciated. Ask this question about every cricketer you admire: did he leave the teams he represented stronger than when he started? Richards did so, which is why he won my vote ahead of Sir Garfield Sobers as one of the Five Wisden Cricketers of the Century. Sobers was the finer cricketer, no doubt the finest all-round cricketer ever. But Richards had the greater impact, greater even than Lloyd or Sir Frank Worrell, who were his forerunners.

What was West Indies before 1976? "Easygoing Calypso cricketers" was the stock description. In that year, mostly in Australia and England, Richards scored more runs in Tests (1710 at an average of 90) than anybody had done in a calendar year before. Andy Roberts was already knocking batsmen over, one way or another, but soon a whole platoon of fast bowlers gathered around the West Indian banner that was - though it was Lloyd's side in name and fact - held aloft by Richards. Thus were the world champions born.

He did the same for his other teams. When Richards made his first-class debut in 1971-72, the Combined Islands had just been allowed to participate in the West Indian first-class domestic tournament, the Shell Shield. Until then, any cricketer from outside Jamaica, Trinidad, Barbados and Guyana was powerless. Richards' own father was a decent player who represented Antigua but never got the opportunity to play a first-class match. When his son got going, the Combined Islands became too powerful, winning the tournament in 1980-81, and were split into the Leewards and Windwards: the outer islands became the dominant force in the Caribbean, as Worrell had predicted.




Ask this question about every cricketer you admire: did he leave the teams he represented stronger than when he started? Richards did so, which is why he won my vote ahead of Sir Garfield Sobers as one of the Five Wisden Cricketers of the Century




The same applied in Antigua. Richards and Roberts put their native island on the map as nobody else could have done. What was a backwater after 1950, when the brutal sugarcane plantations were finally abolished, was transformed into a highly desirable tourist destination and Test venue by 1981. Quite an advance for an island of 80,000 people.

Richards empowered Somerset and Glamorgan too, the two counties he represented. Somerset was the Antigua of English cricket until the 1970s: a backwater. They had never won anything in their history. Led by Richards (though Brian Rose was the actual captain), they became the one-day team of their era in English cricket, the Liverpool or Manchester United, winning five trophies in five seasons. Almost single-handedly Richards won Cup finals at Lord's, striding out and making a hundred, instilling self-belief into small-town players who had never possessed it before.

Glamorgan were the same, or even worse, by the time Richards joined them in 1990 - famous only for internal bickerings and bad signings. Richards propelled them to the Sunday League title in 1993, in his final competitive season. In an innings of power and self-belief, if fading dominance, he had to ward off a young tearaway called Duncan Spencer to see Glamorgan home in their final match "after 23 seasons of often abject failure" as Wisden put it. Nobody has called the county a joke since.

It would be hyperbole to assert that Richards empowered Afro-Caribbeans everywhere. But by means of his cricket he gave those of them interested in cricket a pride and sense of responsibility - to themselves, to destiny - which they had never known before. "Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery" sang Bob Marley at the same time as Richards walked down pavilion steps and on to the field. "None but ourselves can free our minds." And Richards was the man who did exactly that.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Thesis Updates

I don't even know why I am putting this up on the web, I have been putting up various articles up on my blog, old, new, very old ones, but this one I am not even sure why I am writing this.

It so happened that my algorithm that I had thought of for my Masters' Thesis, works and works perfectly, or rather I should say worke"D" perfectly only because there was a bug in the code, now after flushing out the bugs, the thing doesn't seem to work at all!!

I've thought of everything, ranging from further bugs in the code, to simple coding mistakes, and also about floating point inaccuracies, and what all and what not. But I increasingly think that the algorithm itself is a bit flawed, it initially appread so simple to put down, almost unbelievably simple! But as lots of other solutions in computer science, it turned out to be the "elegant, beautiful and wrong" solution.... (OR IS IT ?)...that is still to be decided, I mean it still has to be decided about the goodness or the badness of results it is throwing up, but methinks it is flawed.

Means atleast I now know/concede that it may be the wrong algorithm altogether, atleast it works perfectly for clique intersections, let us give it that much credit. Two perfect cliques intersecting, it catches them pretty well.

Well the intriguing part is that why does it work so perfectly with the bug, for all those who've read this all the way so far, the bug was simply writing '0' inplace of 0 and '1' in place for 1..which translates to writing 48&49 in place of 0&1 (in ASCII codes)...well 48 and 49 worked as pure charms, when it came to that particular graph size (I was using 200 nodes I guess, to test my algo)...the strange thing is, or maybe not that strange - those numbers 48.49 worked perfectly well for that size 200, but bombed for other sizes, like say 70...(for which I used 15&16, and they worked like a charm !!)

So here I am, blogging about this failure of mine, well, not exactly a failure, now that I know there is an approach that won't work, I'm wiser that way...And wiser still, I know a bug that can actually make it work :P

Maybe it's time to ask my guide to allow me to investigate the bug a little, or for him to do so, anyways time is running out fast, I need to have an algorithm, tests on benchmarks, and get everything done by 29th Novemeber, which happens to be a very good day, in order to meet the submission deadline of 30th Novemeber.

PS: The dreaded placements approach :(, they start the next day infact :( and I guess I'll be in Bombay giving the Morgan Stanley interview (hopefully) on the 29th Nov (although the dates haven't arrived yet, but it will be during that time)...

PPS: In the meanwhile, you hope and pray that I get through, I'll do the dirty work of preparing for those interviews !